Konstruk Green Skills dalam pengembangan Teori KAP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55314/tsg.v4i5.614Keywords:
Sikap, keterampilan hijau, pengetahuan, praktikAbstract
Kebutuhan akan konsep teoritis dan konstruksi empiris keterampilan hijau dalam pengembangan pendidikan berkelanjutan sebagai upaya untuk menjaga lingkungan diharapkan dapat menghasilkan strategi baru dalam konteks pendidikan dan pelatihan dalam pendidikan vokasional. Studi ini dilakukan menggunakan teknik diskusi kelompok terfokus (FGD) yang bertujuan untuk mendapatkan kesepakatan para ahli tentang isi pengetahuan dan praktik yang akan dimasukkan dalam Konstruksi Keterampilan Hijau. Selama FGD, diberikan dua pernyataan tertutup dan pertanyaan terbuka. Pernyataan tertutup dianalisis menggunakan rumus Aiken. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa dari tujuh indikator konstruksi, empat indikator telah dikembangkan dan dipelajari hingga tahap pernyataan yang akan digunakan untuk penilaian diri siswa kemudian. Sementara itu, tiga indikator dari model KAP dimasukkan dalam konstruksi keterampilan hijau yang tetap. Sebagai hasilnya, konstruksi keterampilan hijau yang dikembangkan memiliki tujuh indikator utama: pengetahuan, sikap, kemampuan, nilai, kesadaran, pemahaman, dan keterampilan hijau untuk mendukung tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan (SDGs) dalam masyarakat (sosial), efisiensi ekonomi, dan lingkungan.
References
Diep, P. C., & Hartmann, M. (2017). Green Skills in Vocational Teacher Education–a model of pedagogical competence for a world of sustainable development. TVET@ Asia, 6, 1–19.
Report on Labor and social trends in Indonesia (2022). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2022. https://data.unhcr.org/fr/documents/details/
Nornazira. S, Said, N.A, Hamid, M.Z. (2020). Green Practices Among Employees for Environmental Sustainability of the Vehicle Service Industry. United International Journal for Research & Technology | Volume 02, Issue 02, 2020 | ISSN: 2582-6832
UNESCO. (2012). Education for sustainable development sourcebook. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/926unesco9.pdf
Alstete, J. W. (2006). Knowledge management and higher education: A critical analysis. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(3), 252–253. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500104
Altinay, F., Dagli, G., & Altınay, Z. (2017). Role of technology and management in tolerance and reconciliation education. Quality & Quantity, 51(6), 2725–2736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135- 016-0419-x
Al-Zawahreh, A., Khasawneh, S., & Al-Jaradat, M. (2019). Green management practices in higher education: The status of sustainable leadership. Tertiary Education and Management, 25(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-018-09014-9
Basari, G., & Altinay, Z. (2018). Tolerance, equality and access in all levels of education quality management. Quality & Quantity, 52(2), 961–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0550-3
Chen, Y., Daamen, T. A., Heurkens, E. W. T. M., & Verheul, W. J. (2019). Interdisciplinary and experiential learning in urban development management education. International Journal of Tech- nology and Design Education, 30, 919–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09541-5
Davies, J. L. (1992). Planning and management for excellence and efficiency of higher education.
Higher Education Policy, 5, 62. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.1992.79
Degn, L. (2015). Sensemaking, sense giving and strategic management in Danish higher education.
Higher Education, 69(6), 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9812-3
Guntzburger, Y., Pauchant, T. C., & Tanguy, P. A. (2017). Ethical risk management education in engineering: A systematic review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(2), 323–350. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11948-016-9777-y
Haines, N. (1973). Education and the management of resources: An account of continuing education.
Higher Education, 2(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137753
Kim, H., & Lee, Y. (2019). A structural model of customer relationship management (CRM) strategies, rapport, and learner intentions in lifelong education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09583-3
Kuoppakangas, P., Suomi, K., Stenvall, J., Pekkola, E., Kivistö, J., & Kallio, T. (2019). Revisiting the five problems of public sector organisations and reputation management – the perspective of higher education practitioners and ex-academics. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marke- ting, 16, 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-019-00223-5
Kusainov, A. K. (2017). Comparative pedagogy. Prosveschenie Kazahstan.
Liubaretz, V.V. (2019). Didactic potential of the virtual educational environment and the possibilities of its practical implementation in managerial education. Bulletin of Mukachevo State University, Pedagogy and Psychology, 1(9), 40–43.
Macheridis, N. (2018). Balancing authority and autonomy in higher education by implementing an agile project management approach. Tertiary Education and Management, 24(2), 128–143. https:// doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1400092
McDonald, R. A. (2000). Reframing management education: A humanist context for teaching in busi- ness and society. Interchange, 31(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011007310120
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 TheJournalish: Social and Government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Thejournalish: Social and Government This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
